If
one was to ask an academician, Maulana Jalāl ad-Dīn Muhammad Rūmī was the master of Love.
However, for most people, Rumi was a mystic Sufi saint, whose lyricism and scholarly
abilities have nurtured the future of thousand poets and artists in modern age.
Rumi had always been a great scholar, teaching law and theology to his
students. Being an erudite, his eloquence
attracted many disciples, despite the fact that he was still in his early
twenties. But the appearance of Shams transformed him into a devotee of music,
dance and poetry. Albeit with his disappearance for the first time, Rumi
immortalized Shams by celebrating him in his poetry as the embodiment of the
divine beloved. History has it when Rumi and Shams met again, they fell at each
other’s feet, not knowing who the lover was and who the beloved. Rumi named an
entire collection of his odes The Works
of Shams of Tabriz. Strangely, apart from researchers, little is known to
the world of his lover, his companion in mysticism, his beloved disciple, Shams
ad-Din of Tabriz. Some even wonder if he had been a real person, at all.
Shams,
which literally translates to ‘the sun’, was a wandering dervish. A fireball,
who had a remarkable curiosity and was a keen observer. Calling himself an
interpreter of dreams, Shams had always known about his innate difference
between himself and the rest of the world. He once asked his father to go back
to his coop, if he wasn’t an ocean like him. Shocked at Shams behavior, his
father was worried about his survival in the world. Little did he know that his
son was anything but ordinary. Shams repeatedly claimed that he never had
dream, instead he just had visions. These very visions were the beginning of
his search for love and companionship. To him, ‘a good man was one thing, a lover something else’.
Long
before Shams of Tabriz met the glorious Rumi, he was aware of his revered
existence. Uncanny as it may seem, the search for his venerated companion made
the dervish travel across the entire Middle-East, when he finally met Rumi, in
Konya, to devour the sherbet of
knowledge and to fill the void that had left his life incomplete. Such was his
devotion that he was ready to sacrifice his head in return of the love that he
was to receive. As for Rumi, Shams became a part of his dream. His longing grew
stronger with each passing day. The finality of their meeting was that they
were inseparable. The sohbet (conversation)
between Shams and Rumi were endless, leading to the inevitable envy amidst
their other loved ones. Their illuminating oneness is still a mystery to
millions. They let themselves be drawn to each other, which paved the way for
the most beautiful poems in the history of poetry.
“The minute I
heard my first love story
I started looking for you, not knowing
how blind that was.
I started looking for you, not knowing
how blind that was.
Lovers don’t
finally meet somewhere.
They’re in each other all along.”
They’re in each other all along.”
Interestingly,
Huston Smith goes as far to compare Dante and Beatrice to Rumi
and Shams. One might always wonder, why Rumi loved or was affectionate
towards Shams to such an extent, that he paid no heed to anyone else. Perhaps,
the answer is intertwined between the memories of those who claim, it always takes but a lover to find his
beloved. It was Rumi’s eyes which found the spiritual magnificence in
Shams.
For
us millennials, perhaps the most difficult theory still remains. What really is
love?
Is it as easy as what Shahrukh Khan narrates in Kuch Kuch Hota Hai? Pyar dosti hai. Love is friendship. Some of us would surely cringe on that dialogue, and others perhaps would drool over its romance. Maybe we share secrets, ice-creams and coffee, trying to decipher love in letters written over WhatsApp statuses.
Is it as easy as what Shahrukh Khan narrates in Kuch Kuch Hota Hai? Pyar dosti hai. Love is friendship. Some of us would surely cringe on that dialogue, and others perhaps would drool over its romance. Maybe we share secrets, ice-creams and coffee, trying to decipher love in letters written over WhatsApp statuses.
Or is Love as unconventional, complex and philosophical as we read through in Rumi’s quotes? Metaphysical, if one may call it. If we are to dive deep into them, we would find ourselves lost in the unnerving ocean of words and their countless meanings. The silence of love has been a matter of discussion between great scholars since time immemorial. Silence too is deafening, when there is a storm of separation between lovers, and perhaps the last conversation they ever share is through the silence of their brimming eyes. Rumi talks of this silence when lovers are drawn into union of love.
As
for my part, to define something I am drawn to because of love, only reminds me
of my father. The minute little things that he does make me feel the most
cherished. Something as mundane as cutting nails becomes precious, if it is
Baba who does it. His stories of struggle in Leh, Madras, Gujarat can keep me
glued to him for eternity. I think, rice, dal and mashed potatoes are the
tastiest if he feeds me. You may call it a stereotypical father-daughter
emotional connect. Nevertheless, it is the stereotype I most admire.
To
define the ‘pull of love’ in vaguely literal terms, can just bind it to
shackles of chains, I believe. True essence of it, is rather subjective to each
human. Let us then reminisce Rumi’s words, “Love is the religion and the
universe is the book.”
No comments:
Post a Comment