There are few things in life which can tell
one about oneself as convincingly as books, if only one knows how to read
correctly. When I read a book, I read more than the letters and the plots, I
read a lot more about me. As I read, the words come together and form a
narrative closely linked with the reality I was wishing to escape from or
trying to grasp a clearer hold of. My apprehensions about my career, my fear of
ending up doing nothing of value joins some hostess’s anxiety of being reduced
to an organiser of an evening full of futile entertainment. Maybe she wanted to
be more than a hostess, maybe she chose the flowers herself because that’s the
only thing she can seek appreciation through. She wants to be more than that
but how could she ever be, so she’ll be the best in what she can be. This is my
review of a book I liked more than I understood. But my Mrs Dalloway is so different from the next reader that I should
doubt my understanding. And I would. Had I not understood that what I see is
what I wish to see. Woolf could’ve whispered in my ear that Dalloway can never
be touched by my everyday anxieties and I still wouldn’t separate them. Because
what’s a character that cannot tell me what I am and what I’m not? And what’s a
book that doesn’t show me myself.
But
do books show or tell? Or maybe Woolf is right in that books reflect, somewhat
like mirrors. Mirrors are some of the most fascinating things for a child. The
first sight of their own reflection is an absurd image because it moves with
them, its eyes seem to be staring into the soul. The realisation slowly sets in
that this image isn’t a trick of the mind but our own self. And we finally
perceive what we are and how we’re seen by everyone around but us. This must be
the strangest power an entity can hold – making us see our own possession. I
believe books hold the same power. Like a fascinated child, we explore the
lines and look for things to make sense of the absurdity someone once wrote
down. Authors and their intentions stop holding meaning beyond an extent as
these carefully constructed worlds are handed off to a reader who comes in
either with naïve notions or high headed expectations. For people like me,
reading books is usually a scavenger hunt because we locate the pieces that can
fit together for our strangely preconceived interpretations to fall into place.
I wonder how I know how to create this coherent meaning suitable to my
worldview. Maybe Woolf is again right in pointing that the origin and source of
these interpretations lie within one’s soul. Where else would that empathy come
from which I felt for Lawrence’s Mrs Morel even when she suffocated her son
with adulation. The never-ending battle between mother and son was inevitable
but had no wrong sides for me. Sons and
Lovers, for me, became the first book which showed humanity in its rawness.
All characters were shades of grey and understandably so. For someone who
resists absolutes and binaries with all their might, complexity is the ultimate
refuge and books about Dalloways and Morels offer me just that.
Just
as one’s mirror image is flipped yet rooted in reality, I realise that this
matter of the soul cannot always be beyond the expectations of one’s realism.
But the soul isn’t ruled by the mind alone, the heart is equally compelling.
And this is why books seem to exist in a plane where the yardsticks of realistic
and unrealistic lose conventional meaning. Whatever hits home is realistic and
whatever doesn’t fit into one’s pursuit of pleasure from reading is rejected.
Books are the mirrors that reflect our souls both explicitly and from between
the lines. The latter is deemed difficult, but what eludes us the most is
reading what lies at the forefront. But once we learn to grasp the reflections
from those pages, we end up with a knowledge which is at times inconceivable but
always invaluable.
- Asna
Jamal
No comments:
Post a Comment